||| FROM BILL APPEL |||
Some complain that they should be asked to vote without a named opponent (of course you can always write in your own).
But there are two good reasons for voting in uncontested elections:
- No opposition may indicate that the job is burdensome and thankless. If someone is willing to take up that burden in public service, thank them by showing your vote of support and confidence in their work for you!
- No opposition may also indicate that the candidate can do or is doing doing work of a quality that no one feels they can match. Thank that person with your vote and encourage that person to make a career of it.
For contest isn’t the point in these cases; public service is.
**If you are reading theOrcasonian for free, thank your fellow islanders. If you would like to support theOrcasonian CLICK HERE to set your modestly-priced, voluntary subscription. Otherwise, no worries; we’re happy to share with you.**
In a county so dependent on volunteerism for public service, Bill makes a valid and generous point. However, in that context, I’m compelled to point out its obverse. Although it may not apply to our current local election, it is critical in many elections at all levels across the country: There should ALWAYS be a choice. Every ballot, whether contested or not, should be required to include a legally countable choice for NOTA: None of the Above.
I am deeply appreciative of the people who are willing to fill these roles. I would like to suggest that even if uncontested, it’s important prepare a brief statement. It is difficult to vote for someone when we don’t have any indication of their positions or who they are.
None of the Above would justify not voting. A further negative indication isn’t necessary.
I agree that blank statements are problematical. Even unopposed candidates need to fulfill their role as candidates if they want the real, not the default, confidence of their communities. If they don’t care, they risk Brian’s response in the form of low numbers.