||| KATIE SCHMIDT for SAN JUAN BUILDING ASSOCIATION |||
Dear Members of San Juan Community,
As many of you know and have experienced firsthand, the effects of COVID continue to plague our community and impact our daily lives.
Recently the Governor has implemented a new Washington State Energy Code as adopted by the Washington State Building Code Council (SBCC) in RCW 19.27A. The code has caused an average increase of $15,000 to $20,000 in increased costs per home, all of which will add to the price of homes here in San Juan County where affordable housing is in great need. These cost increases are due, in part, to enormous and unprecedented supply chain delays for building materials, many of which are needed for compliance with the new residential energy code The San Juan Building Association (SJBA) is working with the BIAW to send the letter below to the Governor’s Office but we wanted to bring
awareness to our local community as well.
The SJBA fully supports the energy code changes and regulations to better improve our environmental impact, however the choice to proceed with the implementation of these codes during covid has the added cost that have become a large financial hardship during this crisis. We encourage people to write to Governor Inslee in support of this request to place the code changes on hold.
OPEN LETTER TO GOVERNOR INSLEE:
Thank you for your leadership during the tumultuous period Washington has faced the past 18 months. Despite much success, however, it’s clear COVID is going to continue disrupting our lives and economy well into the foreseeable future.
The choices that Washington employers have had to make are unprecedented. All are facing long-term effects on the cost of operations – and those costs must be passed on to consumers. Nowhere have the consequences of these additional costs been demonstrated more than in construction.
The Building Industry Association of Washington (BIAW) urges you to address the increased cost of building Washington’s housing by temporarily pausing the new requirements from the implementation of the recent Washington State Energy Code as adopted by the Washington State Building Code Council (SBCC) in RCW 19.27A.
Since the implementation in February, homebuilders have seen an average of $15,000 to $20,000 in increased costs per home, all of which add to the price buyers pay on their future residences. These cost increases are due, in part, to enormous and unprecedented supply chain delays for building materials, many of which are needed for compliance with the new residential energy code. For example:
-
- Windows compliant with the new code are taking up to 30 weeks for delivery, as there is only one NW manufacturer producing them. Windows compliant with the previous code are available in just 8 weeks. Prices for the new code-compliant windows are also 40-50 percent higher.
- Supplies of heat pumps compliant with the new code are also behind. Delivery times have increased from 30 to 90 days and costs for those new systems have increased up to $6,900.
- Finally, builders are struggling to source the 400-amp service panels now required due to all the additional electrical components and delivery times are no longer even being provided by manufacturers.
Given the reality of these supply chain delays – and the additional costs caused by the operational setbacks – BIAW urges you to provide relief to Washington’s future homeowners by pausing the new residential energy code through March 31, 2022. Our state’s housing crisis needs real solutions and a pause will provide relief while supply chains across the globe recover from shutdowns and slowdowns.
All Washington businesses require time to organize, adjust to and overcome the challenges facing them daily throughout the global health crises. Home buyers deserve the consideration of this extension.A pause until April will benefit local governments that are facing strained revenue and staffing shortages, businesses related to the supply chain of residential home building, and the burgeoning affordable housing deficit. Granting this pause allows builders and industry leaders to make the necessary adjustments to their operations without hasty decision-making and less than thorough implementation, saving time and money.
Washington needs to take serious steps to combat the supply shortage and increased price of housing at all levels. Already the average new home price is over $522,000—meaning roughly three-quarters of families are priced out. For every $1,000 increase 2,500 families are priced out of new home ownership opportunities.
Thank you for your consideration of this request to help address the housing supply crisis in Washington so that working families can access affordable home ownership opportunities.
**If you are reading theOrcasonian for free, thank your fellow islanders. If you would like to support theOrcasonian CLICK HERE to set your modestly-priced, voluntary subscription. Otherwise, no worries; we’re happy to share with you.**
I own and live in an 1100 sq. ft. home in Eastsound that has 200 amp electrical service. A 400 sq. ft. mobile home that I rent out long term to a local has 100 amp electrical service. If the new code requires provision of 400 amp service for new residential construction this is costly and way overkill for tiny and modest sized homes. Consider that they have less impact on the environment than trophy homes and should not be held to the same standard for the capacity of electrical service, for example, as for larger homes. Given the supply constraints due to COVID the building code changes should be delayed until the lockdowns are over and then phased in gradually.
Agree, 100% Tony. –Spirit Eagle–
If you wanted to put in a high speed electric vehicle charger for an environmentally friendly vehicle you would likely need at least a dedicated 80 AMP circuit to get what you want. Of course you really should all use only solar and wind and plan to build without any need to buy electric but the ability to sell your excess to the grid. For people who want to be environmentally conscious, that makes the most sense. The payback is 10-15 years in many cases so it’s worth the investment for people who are lucky enough to ever get there and will always call Orcas home forever.