— from David Kobrin —

During the years Donald Trump has been President I’ve come to accept he means what he says. When he wants something, he often finds a way, even when it defies tradition and precedent.   

In his 2016 campaign, for instance, Mr. Trump pledged to build a border wall. Mexico refused to pay. Then Congress, whose Constitutional responsibility it is to control the purse, refused to pay. President Trump declared a “national emergency,” transferred funds designated by Congress for the military, and used those funds for the wall.  

The President has said that Article II of the Constitution grants him the authority to do what he believes needs to be done. He has regularly “fired” those who have disagreed with him, or questioned his decisions. Generals, colonels, ambassadors, lawyers, an attorney general, public scientists, all have been bad mouthed by the president, and/or removed from their positions.  

Because he has shown himself true to his word, even in the face of obstacles, I fear for the validity of the 2020 Presidential election.   

After the 2016 election Mr. Trump said there were 3 million illegal voters in California — even though investigations by local election officials, whether Republican, Democratic, or Independent, have shown this charge unfounded.   

What if the official results in November, 2020 showed Mr. Trump had been defeated by his opponent?

Would the President step down and peacefully hand over power?   

Or would he declare the election invalid, a fraud? And, therefore, say he is not bound by the results? 

As an historian I know that would be the first time in our history that a presidential candidate refused to abide by the legally binding results (even, once, when it was a negotiated compromise).  

What would breaking that historical precedent — if it happened — mean for the future of elections in America?