— from Eleanor Hoague and Marc Cohen —

Although planning for the Prune Alley improvement project has already moved into its final stages, one important aspect of it has not, in our opinion, received adequate attention: lighting. And this is not just our opinion, as has been made clear by the groundswell of opposition that has appeared in Orcas Issues and at the EPRC Zoom meeting of June 25.

No compelling case has been made for the addition of seventeen light posts, each 16 feet high, along the four-block stretch of Prune Alley. And there would have to be a compelling reason for us to take a step that would so drastically change the character of our little village of Eastsound. Does anyone really want Eastsound to become a smaller version of Coupeville or Leavenworth?

Supporters of the street lighting cite safety (and, to a lesser extent, security) as the reason we need to do this. Claims have been made about how dangerous the traffic is on Prune Alley, how unsafe the crossings are for pedestrians, and how many accidents have occurred there. But these claims have been advanced without even anecdotal evidence.

The facts simply do not bear them out.

According to Sheriff’s Office records, there have been five vehicular incidents in the last 12 years, and 21 in the last 30 years, on Prune Alley, all of them minor incidents. In only one of these was visibility cited as a contributing factor. Every one of these 26 cases involved vehicles only (many of them parked vehicles). Not a single one involved a pedestrian.
Of course pedestrian safety is important, and we are not suggesting that we should wait for there to be a pedestrian injury before taking steps to improve it. By all means, include well-marked pedestrian cross-walks, perhaps with lit pavers, to assist pedestrians crossing Prune Alley at night, and to help make them visible to drivers. But those ugly, urban, light towers? Please, no.

Please join us in urging the EPRC to recommend against placing these eye-sores on Prune Alley. And let us hope that the County Council takes note of the public’s opposition to them.