||| FROM SEATTLE TIMES |||
Washington state’s U.S. senators and its governor have joined forces against a proposal from U.S. Rep. Mike Simpson, R-Idaho, to remove four hydroelectric dams on the Lower Snake River and replace their benefits as part of a multi-trillion dollar infrastructure bill being crafted by the Biden administration.
The proposal had gained the support of Oregon Gov. Kate Brown, U.S. Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., as well as many tribes, after it was announced last winter.
But Republican members of Washington’s congressional delegation opposed Simpson’s plan before it was even officially released, and the state’s top Democratic elected officials were largely mum until Thursday.
“While we appreciate Rep. Simpson’s efforts and the conversations we have had so far with Tribes and stakeholders, it is clear more work within the Pacific Northwest is necessary to create a lasting, comprehensive solution, and we do not believe the Simpson proposal can be included in the proposed federal infrastructure package,” U.S. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., and Gov. Jay Inslee said in a joint statement provided to The Seattle Times.
The two Democratic leaders added that regional collaboration on a comprehensive, long-term solution to protect and bring back salmon populations in the Columbia River Basin and throughout the Pacific Northwest is needed now more than ever.
But they urged a process to a solution that would honor tribal treaty rights, ensure reliable transportation and use of the river, ongoing access for anglers and sport fishers and the continued delivery of reliable hydropower.
“Washington state has a history of successfully bringing diverse groups together to develop solutions that benefit all stakeholders. This must be the model for the management of the Columbia River Basin,” the two continued in their statement.
U.S. Sen. Maria Cantwell also told The Seattle Times she does not support the Simpson proposal, though she does support salmon recovery not only in the Columbia Basin, but across the region, and collaborative processes to get there.
“This proposal has some things we should focus on; diversifying beyond hydro is a great idea, planning for new investment is a great idea, but the rest is not well thought out enough at this point,” Cantwell said of the Simpson proposal.
“Very, very valuable salmon recovery needs to happen and we shouldn’t miss the opportunity of this infrastructure bill to do that, and Puget Sound, being a powerhouse of salmon recovery opportunity, should be focused on. We should be clear that we are maximizing those opportunities.”
Money to help pay for removal and replacement of highway culverts that block salmon passage is just one such investment that could be made in the federal infrastructure package, Cantwell said.
READ FULL ARTICLE: www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/environment/gov-inslee-washington-states-u-s-senators-reject-gop-congressmans-pitch-on-lower-snake-river-dam-removal
Democratic leaders would seem to be behind the curve on this one. Snake River dam removal has been studied and discussed for a long time, and now that it’s proposed by a Republican senator we have sudden Democratic opposition? If restoration of Salish Sea salmon populations is so important–and it is–we should be anticipating and supporting good solutions, or, if they’re not good, finding better ones.
Unfortunately, for Mike Simpson’s plan, the devil is in the details:
http://wildfishconservancy.org/rep.-simpson2019s-201cconcept201d-to-breach-the-lower-snake-river-dams-would-undermine-the-very-wild-salmon-and-steelhead-it-aims-to-protect-and-recover
https://waterwatch.org/snake-river-dams-and-simpson-proposal/
https://biologicaldiversity.org/w/news/press-releases/northwest-senators-urged-to-reject-rep-simpsons-disastrous-plan-for-endangered-salmon-2021-03-16/