||| FROM MICHAEL RIORDAN, FRED KLEIN, and ROBERT AUSTIN |||
This morning brought yet another in a misleading series of emails from Eastsound Water Users Association, this time about all the legal expenses it has been running up during the past two years — and blaming the more than $160,000 in costs on the usual suspects. But the table provided somehow neglected to include the tens of thousands in legal costs attributable to EWUA General Manager Dan Burke.
As he told one of us (RA) in an email, almost $71,390 were spent on “employment-related claims” that were largely “due to the considerable time that was spent during the second half of the year resolving an employment dispute.” Including that in the mix brings the total legal expenses to more than $230,000 — and growing — in two years.
A closer look at the record reveals that the first person to threaten major legal action was Burke himself. In March 2023 his attorney Beth Van Moppes accused Tenar Hall and Steve Smith of harassment at the very moment they were trying to do their jobs as EWUA board members and question his unauthorized self-payments of over $10,000 in late 2022.
Despite confirmation of this serious problem by CPA Tiffany Couch of Acuity Forensics LLP, the board majority caved in to Burke’s demands in a confidential settlement agreement reached in August. Due to its secrecy, we cannot confirm the exact amounts involved but can confidently conclude that the bulk of the more than $101,240 EWUA spent for legal fees in 2023 stemmed from this threatened action — including an estimated $25,000 reimbursement of Burke’s legal expenses. Another, lesser cost resulted from a complaint lodged against him by a female employee that she had received unfair compensation.
What’s more, most of the legal expenses of over $80,000 quoted in the table for defending against the Farm to Market lawsuit over the botched 2023 election could easily have been avoided by running the election again, correcting the EWUA omission of a third slot on the ballot. Instead, the board decided to contest the lawsuit in Court, and most of the legal expenses were the result. So it’s unfair and indeed wrong to blame them entirely on Farm to Market LLC. The board decided to spend our money on it.
Looking at the record of the past eighteen months and comparing the legal expenses with those occurring under Paul Kamin’s tenure as general manager, a clear, alarming pattern emerges. During the last five years of Paul’s tenure, EWUA spent an average $3,305 for legal expenses, according to IRS Form 990s filed for 2016 through 2020. But those costs have literally exploded to at least an average $123,488 (and growing) during 2023-2024 when Burke has been serving as general manager. That’s an increase of more than 3700 percent. Only the financially naive can attribute such a mountainous increase to external factors.
uch factors likely play a role, but another plausible contribution arises due to a general manager who doesn’t think much about engaging attorneys and a compliant board majority that doesn’t try to rein him in. Correlation does not imply causation, of
course, but it’s hard to ignore the Everest of legal expenses draining the EWUA bank account and paint them entirely on the backs of outsiders — especially when the very first major costs were the direct result of his threatened legal actions.
These mounting legal expenses provide further evidence of the EWUA management failures we discussed previously in these pages. They give members additional reasons to recall the board majority of Teri Nigretto, Jim Nelson, Michael Cleveland and Leith Templin on September 28.
**If you are reading theOrcasonian for free, thank your fellow islanders. If you would like to support theOrcasonian CLICK HERE to set your modestly-priced, voluntary subscription. Otherwise, no worries; we’re happy to share with you.**
A further observation on the constant stream of misinformation coming from the EWUA Board:
This last Tuesday, 9/23, all members of EWUA received an email from EWUA, titled “A Letter from Your Vice President, Jim Nelson”. This letter contains substantial misrepresentations.
In the second paragraph of his note, Jim Nelson states:
“After carefully reviewing our financials, studying the claims posted on the RecallWater website, studying the reams of court filings, and speaking with Orcas Island water customers, the WA Department of Health, Office of Drinking Water (ODW) concluded that EWUA is “an exemplary water utility” and a “positive influence on the local communities they serve.”
I note that the phrases “an exemplary water utility” and “positive influence on the local community” occur in a recent letter from the WA Department of Health, which was distributed to EWUA members in an official letter from Teri Nigretto (9/11/24) titled: “Letter from Your President: The Department of Health!”. So I presume this is the careful review that Mr. Nelson is referring to.
The 1-page letter, from Raquel Callans, PE, Regional Engineer, N.W. Drinking Water Operations, WA DOH is here:
https://www.eastsoundwater.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Eastsound_Water_Users_22170_SJ_20240911.pdf
The letter mentions no detailed financial review, no review of the RecallWater website, no review of the “reams of court filings”. It mentions simply “To carry out this goal, we inspect water system facilities and review planning documents. Which include technical, managerial, and financial information.”
I found Mr. Nelson’s claims quite curious, as the DOH does not typically review “reams of court filings” or perform forensic accounting services. I served as President of EWUA for more than a decade, and have some passing familiarity with the WA Department of Health and how it interacts with EWUA.
So, I contacted Raquel Callans earlier this week, and asked what level of review the DOH performed, and did that level of review conform to the claims made by Mr. Nelson.
She promptly replied:
“I made my statement in regards to our legal authority, implementing 246-290 (drinking water regulations). I did not review information on the Recall water website. I came from the standpoint of working with EWUA on a continuous basis, for multiple projects, emergency response, planning documents, sanitary surveys, customer response. We have also had Dan Burke present at local AWWA trainings. I do not know financial details, we have reviewed their budget in their water system plan. “
That is to say, DOH simply did not perform the level and types of analysis Mr. Nelson claims. It appears from her response that Mr. Nelson, in his official mailing to the entire membership, days before his own recall is up for a vote, has misrepresented the work of DOH.
Mr. Nelson needs to correct his statement, with an explanation. His use of the EWUA official email list to distribute biased misinformation, and to call for the removal of his fellow board members, is highly inappropriate, and the membership should not tolerate this.
Yes, Brian, anything coming from the “Eastsound Water Team” must now be swallowed with a large grain of NaCl. Looks like brine is getting into our local water supply. Saltwater intrusion. ¡ And trust has largely evaporated. Sad.
Water users are going to ultimately bear the legal fees whoever prevails. This is how our legal system works? I miss Paul.
What is sad is the constant drivel that the recall squad constantly puts out. What they don’t talk about is the 51% ownership of EWUA that they are trying to achieve. What they don’t talk about is what happened in Nebraska. What they don’t talk about is how well EWUA is being run under the majority board and the manager. What they don’t talk about is their real motives for creating such strife to our water company.
The real solution to all these problems is for the lawsuits to stop, and for all the members to vote to recall Cook, Anderson, and Claus.
I forwarded Jim Nelson’s “from the desk of…” email to Raquel Callans, unaware that Brian or others had done so, and she confirmed in an email today that her department did not review any legal documents, the recall water website, overall financial details… claims Jim Nelson claimed had been the case in his email.
Such blatant and egregiously deceptive propaganda has no place coming from our Board, yet chair Teri Nigretto has been firing off too many such missives to properly respond to, with the apparent intent of misdirecting the attention of members to “what happened in Nebraska” and other irrelevant straw-man arguments. (and no, Dan… no one is attempting to take over the EWUA water supply, though the Board in 2021 did discuss a possible transition to an employee ownership system, which was rejected back then).
Members, please don’t forget to vote to remove the four “majority” members that have been the source of these problems, and have collectively been wasting your money on massive legal fees when they could have agreed to solve simple problems instead. Even if they are your friends, because sometimes friends are not the best fit to the board they might be serving on.
Michael’s summary of costs brings into question the validity of the costs quoted by EWUA in their recent letter to the members dated September 24, 2024. I have looked at the year-end numbers for 2023 and July 2024 profit and loss numbers, and things don’t jive. In 2023, the year-end legal costs were $101,240.02. Actual legal costs shown on the EWUA table show legal expenses of $14,900. There is a difference of $86,340.00 spent that is not identified. We know that there were legal costs paid to Dan Burke due to his lawsuit, plus legal settlement agreements prepared for employees disgruntled with management. These activities most likely cover the difference in legal costs associated with 2023 expenses.
As of the end of July 2024, the profit and loss statement shows legal expenses of $77,819.55. However, the EWUA table shows expenses of $145,737. Ms. Doyea, in her declaration to the court on September 17th, provided a detailed time sheet showing the hours she spent through the end of August 2024. This totaled $20,064.00. EWUA is asking for restitution from the minority board members for this cost. It appears that the EWUA table numbers are overinflated by $48,148.00. The recall lawsuit activity only started the second week of August 2024. This would mean that Doyea spent over 114 hours supporting the recall in the first part of September. This is highly unlikely, as it would mean she was working on nothing but the EWUA recall for the first part of September.
One more point: the Concerned Eastsound Water Users sued to ensure that the recall would be run fairly, and they paid for the recall efforts out of their own pockets. Ultimately, it made an impact. Everything requested in the suit has been done. The recall of the minority board has not been paid for by those who issued the recall but by the members of EWUA. Does this seem fair? These folks should have some of their own money being spent to support their recall effort.
This is a prime example if you believe there is an accounting problem at EWUA. Please vote by proxy or come to the meeting on September 28th at 5:00 PM at Orcas Center and cast your ballot to recall Teri Nigretto, Jim Nelson, Leith Templin, and Mike Cleveland. Time is running out to support the minority board, Carol Ann Anderson, Jim Cook, and Ron Claus.
Thank you.
As former County Prosecutor Randy Gaylord recently wrote, Dan, there is insufficient cause to recall Cook, Anderson and Claus:
https://theorcasonian.com/letter-to-editor-be-sure-to-vote-in-eastsound-water-election/.
It’s just a trumped-up charge (if you’ll pardon my verb choice) meant to sow confusion among less-well-informed EWUA members. But Randy DID agree that there were solid reasons to recall Nigretto, Nelson, Cleveland and Templin.
I hope that on Saturday thoughtful EWUA members will follow the recommendations of a respected local official who knows a lot about good evidence.