— from San Juan County Ferry Advisory Committee (see below for names) —
Tim Eyman is back on the ballot with another $30 car-tab initiative, I-976. You may have seen the TV ads or visited www.no976.com on the web. Among a long list of cuts, I-976 would have an immediate effect on funding for ferry operations as well as maintenance and improvements.
The repercussions of Eyman’s I-695 20 years ago should not be forgotten: Ferry fares nearly doubled over the following few years, and new vessel construction was shut down for the following decade. Ferry construction was funded by the vehicle excise tax, which was never replaced. There is still no capital funding program to replace aging ferries, each one requires an act of legislature and a patchwork of funding including a ticket surcharge. We see the continuing impact of I-695 every time we ride a ferry, and if I-976 passes it will only get worse.
I-976 would limit car tab fees to $30 and eliminate or limit a spectrum of weight and other fees, severely impacting transportation funding. Three-quarters of the hit is on the “Multimodal” Account, which funds a wide variety of alternative transportation systems: buses, light rail, HOV and HOT lanes, and … ferries.
For the current biennium (July 2019 to June 2021) $45 million is appropriated from the multimodal account to ferries operations. This represents about 9% of the total funding for operations and is very
much at risk if I-976 passes.
The impact of this initiative statewide would be huge. How much of that would fall on WSF is unknown at this point, WSDOT and the legislature would have to make some very hard choices. But there is no magic, a decrease in ferries operations funding means reduced service or higher fares, or both. And another attack on transportation funding would certainly dampen any enthusiasm that the legislature might have for transportation improvements.
Please join us in voting “No!” on Initiative 976.
San Juan County Ferry Advisory Committee
Jim Corenman, Chair, San Juan Island;
Rick Hughes, County Council;
Larry Vandermay, Orcas;
Ken Burtness, Lopez;
Jennifer Swanson, Shaw;
Deborah Hopkins Buchanan, Visitors;
Pat McKay, Commercial Rep.
Eyman’s “solutions” always seem like good ideas…until one of them is enacted.
Here’s another one which deserves a “No” vote.
Just say NO to Tim Eyman…NO NO NO!!!
Two points to consider:
1. Continuing to tolerate a tax scheme based on inflating the actual value of our vehicles is not in our best interest.
2. wE Fail to recognize that the vast majority (80%) of the money raised goes to the greater urban area’s pipe dreams for multimodal types of transportation. The rest goes for all the things the politicians threaten to take away or reduce – state troopers, rural roads and bridges, and ferries.
Until priorities change and an honest tax base is used –VOTE YES.