||| FROM AMANDA MONTAGUE |||


The recent articles posted by Mia Kartinger on the dysfunction in OIFR leadership elicited some uninformed and unfortunate comments that need to be responded to. I could not agree more with Henry and Carol, and also want to thank Mia for the thankless role of trying to bring to light the utter dysfunction at OIFR. 

  1. The OIFR absolutely works tirelessly for the community, despite the lack of leadership from the top.
  2. The allegations are serious. There has been no “beating around the bush.” While personally I don’t think there is anything “vague” about what has been brought forth, it is challenging to go in to depth about what is happening in the Department, given the relentless retaliation that continues to happen for those who are working there and have been trying to go through proper channels and chains of command to have the serious issues raised appropriately addressed.
  3. It is absurd to suggest that the reason career members and others are leaving the Department is because they are “not getting their way.” The disgrace lies with the failure of OIFR leadership to appropriately and professionally address serious complaints that have been raised internally for well over a year.
  4. There are a few reliable voices who continue to aggressively go after anyone who speaks publicly about the widespread dysfunction that OIFR leadership has caused. It is puzzling to me that it is the same voices who continually went after the Department for perceived wrong doing during my tenure as Commissioner alongside Commissioners Fuller, Helminski, Heinmiller and Christmas. What has changed?
  5. It is the height of hypocrisy that these same voices are now questioning the “working knowledge or professional credentials” of those raising questions. There are few that have actual knowledge and the professional credentials to assess what has been happening within the Department, but I can’t imagine anyone thinking that the members of the Department don’t possess both the knowledge and the appropriate professional credentials to assess what the problems are. The fact that the entire union unanimously declared a Vote of No Confidence in Chief Williams should have been a warning sign months ago. The fact that two career paramedics and Dr. Corsa have announced that they are leaving the Department within the last week should end this debate. There is no doubt that no one knows more about what is going on than the current leadership and the OIFR Commission, and that’s the true tragedy here. Instead of addressing any of the serious issues, they continue to go down a path of tarnishing the names of good people and filing investigation upon investigation upon members in the Department. This behavior is shameful, and it is completely at odds with what real leadership does in challenging times.
  6. As one of many community members who continue to wait ad nauseum on public records requests to be produced, I would love to know how Leith got her hands on a complete transcript of the open mic incident, in which there was inappropriate banter between a probationary employee and the new Assistant Chief. I’m sure I’m not the only community member who would love any tips that Leith can provide in getting access to documents in a more timely manner.
  7. Is OIFR a “para-military organization,” as Leith suggests? I suppose we can end this debate and these questions right now if that is the consensus amongst community members and if the definition of “para-military organization” includes working in a hostile environment, being put under gag orders and endless investigations from the OIFR Commission and leadership when legitimate complaints are raised. There are really good people who have tried to no avail to bring their concerns appropriately up the chain of command. Instead of addressing the real issues that exist, OIFR leadership has made the decision to ignore the concerns and treat those who are raising the issues with an amazing lack of respect and retaliation. I doubt that there are many who don’t understand that the way a fire department is structured and operates is fundamentally different from other entities or organizations, but OIFR works for the community. The community gets to choose what type of leadership they would like to see that best supports the members of the Department, and that certainly includes holding them to account to acting and behaving in accordance with existing laws and protocols.
  8. Patrick Shepler rightfully and overwhelmingly won his seat as Commissioner in his race against Wes Heinmiller. The continual smear campaign started by then-Commissioner Heinmiller at the public OIFR Board meeting in December and continued on in Leith’s comments to this post, are shameful. It’s too cute by half for Leith to claim that she does “not feel it is my place to expose” information that she has on Commissioner Shepler, while simultaneously defaming him. Come on now. This is nonsense and is insulting to not just Commissioner Shepler, but to anyone who has benefited from his service with OIFR over many, many years.
  9. I would respectfully suggest to those who continue to go after Mia and others who are raising concerns about leadership at OIFR that they should hold tight for a second with their blind lashing out and defense of some rather indefensible behavior from the top. Public records requests will come through and it will not paint a pretty picture of what has been going on internally. Speaking out and shining light on what has been happening within OIFR is not appalling or misguided, it is indeed the only thing that might remedy a pretty dire situation. And if history has anything to say about this, bullies and bullying behavior never wins in the end, and there’s absolutely no reason to believe that it will carry the day here.

 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email