By Janet Knowles
(Please see editorial note below, following this opinion)
Bond Transparency
This Bond proposal is huge in good times, but inconceivable in hard economic ones. In my experience as a school Business Manager and Board member at all school levels, I had to ask why a District with declining enrollment would propose such a Bond measure.
Historical Numbers
Apparently the Middle School, which is less than 30 years old, is in such disrepair that it needs replacing due to lack of maintenance for many years. But based on enrollment, it doesn’t need replacement. The enrollment of Orcas students is in decline. School peak in 1998-99 was 585 full time students. In 2005/06, there were 500 students, the next year 465, then 430 then 417 (State of Washington website – Office of Superintendant of Public Instruction). Currently, there are 395 students (stats from Keith Whitaker). If 585 students used to occupy this space and we now only have 395 students (388 for 2010/11), there is no need for a replacement building. The Middle school students could be merged with the Elementary and High School buildings.
OASIS in the mix
The District claims enrollment is above 500 when OASIS students are included. That is true – technically. Except the vast majority of OASIS students are ‘cyber’ students who live elsewhere in Washington. The Administration and Board use these ‘inflated’ numbers to illustrate that the enrollment is rising on Orcas when in reality the resident students (who live on Orcas and attend) the school are in decline. The District is working towards a ‘virtual’ school here on Orcas – using the OASIS arm as the ‘need’ for additional capital buildings. However these non-resident cyber students will never attend the school – instead they teleconference and communicate via computer. Whitaker and others share that the enrollment will steadily increase – due to the success of the OASIS program. We should not count ‘out of district’ cyber students in defining the real physical needs at the school? Where is the transparency in the discussion for the Bond proposal?
The school’s distorted enrollment numbers don’t show the true trend line which could easily be below 350 resident students in five years. We may have 1000 students enrolled but only 350 attend the school so why the need for new structures? Full-Time Equivalency monies are paid for each student ‘enrolled’ within that District – hence the recruitment for out-of-district students since the school gets the dollars but not the ‘attending’ student. There is no increasing enrollment. No space is needed for OASIS cyber students since teachers communicate with students via the computer at home or in a coffee shop. Why should Orcas taxpayers pay for the projected ‘space needs’ for out of district students?
Extending the timeline
At the May 12, 2010 Special Board Meeting, increasing the payback time on the Bond to 25 years was deemed “a better choice for those on a fixed income and given the current economic climate”. So making a really poor decision but spreading it over a longer life will make it more palatable to the voters? When I asked at a Special Meeting where in Seattle or any other place in America a public school existed like their proposal, I received blank stares and no response.
With declining ‘true’ enrollment numbers, why is a Bond being proposed for $27 million? Proposing and planning such grandiose ideas for a public school in a community as small as ours to meet the needs of a small and declining true enrollment is incomprehensible.
Before you vote on the Bond measure, do what Barbara Kline says – educate yourself about the merits, cost and who truly benefits from this expenditure in a District with real declining enrollment.
Editor’s Note: There are factual inaccuracies in Ms. Knowles’ opinion piece above. These inaccuracies are addressed in the accompanying Guest Opinion by Orcas Island School District Business Manager Keith Whitaker.
**If you are reading theOrcasonian for free, thank your fellow islanders. If you would like to support theOrcasonian CLICK HERE to set your modestly-priced, voluntary subscription. Otherwise, no worries; we’re happy to share with you.**
The editor does a disservice to Ms Knowles by claiming that there are factual inaccuracies in the article. Ms Knowles enrollment facts appear to be the same as Mr Whitaker’s, they each choose to emphasize different groups of students. Ms Knowles is concerned with the enrollment of students who will go to the school and sit in the classrooms; Mr Whitaker, with the total entollment of students.
In the interests of transparency I would be interested to see the detailed breakdown of the current enrollment divided into the categories: Orcas OASIS students, non-Orcas OASIS students, regular students (non-OASIS). I would also be interested in these numbers for previous school years if available.
Janet refers to getting some of her information from the OSPI (Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction) website which lists public information about each school district in the state.
Therefore, I went to OSPI website to see if something incorrect had been posted because I knew that the numbers she listed were not accurate. At the OSPI website I looked under Finance and then Apportionment/Financial Services to find the Orcas Island School District apportionment files for the last five years. These are the most accurate reports as they are the ones that OSPI uses to fund the district based on the student FTE count.
Over the last five years, the lowest headcount listed in the apportionment reports is 487 students in both May 2007 and May 2008. The lowest student FTE (full time equivalent) number is 457.89 in May 2008.
OSPI’s website can be very confusing and I will be interested to know where at OSPI Janet found the information that she uses to state. “In 2005/06, there were 500 students, the next year 465, then 430 then 417 (State of Washington website – Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction).”
John’s request for a detailed breakdown of the data makes sense and we are happy to provide the information. We will provide and post the breakdown requested by the end of tomorrow, July 14th
Here is a table that shows the enrollment over time. I decided to start it in October 2000 which is the year before OASIS was started. Because Janet was concerned about counting students who did not actually come to the school campus, I subtracted OASIS K-8 from the OISD total in the final column.
OASIS 9-12 and Waldron Island Elementary students are part of the Orcas Island School District and attend classes on campus. Some of the OASIS K-8 students also attend classes on campus, though I subtracted all of them in the final column. As of the end of the school year 2009-10, a minority of the OASIS students are from off island families.
I used headcount as the best measure of the students who will be using the facilities. Headcount is a count of the actual students who are in each grade. A student’s “head” can only be counted one time even if he/she is attending classes in two schools. For example a student at Orcas High School taking classes in OASIS High School will be counted in the headcount in the school in which he/she is attending the most classes.
In addition to headcount, the state also counts by FTE (Full Time Equivalent). This is the count according to the number of classes or amount of time that a student spends in school, or that the state will pay for.
Some examples:
—our full time kindergarten students have to be counted as half time students even though they are on campus all day. The state will only pay for half of a kindergarten student.
—the state pays for only five of the six classes that most of our high school students take. We pay for the sixth or seventh class out of local funds.
—a student who attends school for part of the day is counted under FTE for that part that he/she attends
The FTE count is usually a lower number than headcount and therefore is not a good number to work with when planning spaces for students.
When we planned the bond, we planned for the spaces needed for out students. Besides being on campus for some classes, OASIS K-8 needs office, storage and staff spaces.
I am happy to meet with anyone who wants to discuss these numbers or has any other questions about the school district or the bond.
Orcas Island School District
K-12 Headcount
OISD K-12
OISD K-12 OASIS K-8 OASIS9-12 Minus OASIS K-8
2009 October 521 75 23 446
2008 October 472 23 23 449
2007 October 475 15 20 460
2006 October 495 23 NA 472
2005 October 537 27 NA 510
2004 October 511 17 NA 494
2003 October 511 17 NA 494
2002 October 537 32 NA 505
2001 October 567 24 NA 543
2000 October 514 NA NA 514
Ok, so I do not know how to post a table very well. Most sorry but that is the best I can do. If anyone would like a paper or a better copy, please email or call me. 298- 1800