FAA announces $38 million for 4 WA projects on IRA’s second anniversary
||| FROM THE OFFICE OF REP. RICK LARSEN |||
EVERETT, WA – Today, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) awarded a total of $38 million to four innovative projects in Washington state aimed at accelerating the production and use of sustainable aviation fuels (SAF) and low-emission aviation technologies. The funding comes from FAA’s Fueling Aviation’s Sustainable Transition (FAST) grant initiative, which was established by the Inflation Reduction Act.
Rep. Rick Larsen (WA-02), the lead Democrat on the Transportation & Infrastructure Committee, emphasized the importance of investing in cleaner and greener aviation fuels and technologies.
“Thanks to the Inflation Reduction Act, sustainable aviation is taking off in Washington state,” said Larsen. “Investing in sustainable aviation fuels and greener technologies is an important step toward reducing aviation emissions and creating more jobs. Congress must continue to partner with innovative companies and the workforce to ensure the United States remains the global leader in cleaner, greener and safer aviation.”
Four Washington Projects Awarded FAST Grants
The FAA awarded a total of $38 million in FAST grants to four projects in Washington state:
- $26.76 million for the bp Cherry Point Refinery in Whatcom County to increase SAF production and blending.
- $4.23 million for ZeroAvia in Everett to support the design, build, and testing of hydrogen fuel cell-powered propulsion system technologies. Larsen recently participated in a ribbon-cutting ceremony for ZeroAvia’s new electric-hydrogen propulsion center at Paine Field.
- $4.5 million for APiJET in Seattle to enhance a ground-based software tool for airlines that recommends fuel optimized routings.
- $2.59 million for Boeing to support its efforts to improve the measurement of fuel quality in an airplane fuel tank. This work will be done in Tukwila, Washington, Fairfax, Virginia, and Berkeley, Missouri.
What bp and ZeroAvia Are Saying
“bp understands the important role sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) could play in contributing to the aviation industry’s goal of reducing carbon emissions – and we continue to consider possible opportunities to produce SAF at our Cherry Point refinery. We welcome the opportunity from the Federal Aviation Administration for our company to proceed to the next stage of Fueling Aviation’s Sustainable Transition (FAST) grant program process,” said Orlando Alvarez, Chairman & President, bp America.
“ZeroAvia will use this funding to advance clean electric propulsion technology in our Everett facility. It is great to see the Inflation Reduction Act delivering on its promise to tackle decarbonization in hard-to-abate sectors like aviation, and we are grateful for Representative Larsen’s support for this important work,” said Val Miftakhov, Founder & CEO, ZeroAvia.
Additional Information
Friday marks two years since the Inflation Reduction Act was signed into law. Taken together, the provisions in the law – which includes $300 million to speed up production and adoption of cleaner aviation fuel and technologies – will reduce carbon emissions by approximately 40 percent by 2030. For more information on the Inflation Reduction Act, click here.
In May, President Biden signed into law the bipartisan, bicameral FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024, which provides a framework to maintain America’s leadership in aviation safety and aerospace innovation, strengthens and diversifies the aviation workforce, improves consumer protections and accessibility, and makes groundbreaking investments in sustainability and resiliency. For more on the FAA Reauthorization Act, click here.
For more information on the FAST grant initiative, click here.
**If you are reading theOrcasonian for free, thank your fellow islanders. If you would like to support theOrcasonian CLICK HERE to set your modestly-priced, voluntary subscription. Otherwise, no worries; we’re happy to share with you.**
“sustainable aviation” – hahahaha. SMH.
Air travel, while clearly energy intensive (for the moving pieces) when compared to floating on the water or rolling down a road, benefits from requiring minimal infrastructure or energy inputs OTHER than the actual vehicles/craft and a place to land. Airlander https://www.hybridairvehicles.com/ has developed a hybrid lighter-than-air craft that also generates aerodynamic lift. Compared to fixed or rotating wing aircraft, these vessels are very energy efficient and obviate the need for construction and maintenance of roads, bridges, docks, etc. There are even proposals to use the jet stream to transport giant balloons of hydrogen from areas where it can be generated efficiently to areas where it is needed https://doaj.org/article/b232f114c74c4d3ea8488f68103243a3. And what of VTOL “taxi” drones? For short distance passenger travel in congested urban areas or across terrain that is difficult or expensive to traverse: bodies of water, steep mountains, unstable soils such as muskeg, etc., small electric passenger drones can be very efficient, though I might wait until the 2.0 version of the A.I. pilot comes out!
My point is that “sustainable aviation” is not necessarily an oxymoron; except when you look at flying cattle-cars full of tourists heading off to be, “unhappy in a different place”!
Travel for leisure at the expense of our shared environment is a destructive luxury that humanity cannot afford. When I am sailing in Deer Harbor, I often see massive, white plastic, floating condos plowing the sound, throwing a wake the size of a small tsunami and burning an obscene amount of diesel fuel, all to entertain a couple of wealthy people. . . . All that damage and expense and for what? Idle amusement?
Surely at least part of the answer to the problem of sustainable transportation is to prioritize necessary transportation over recreational transportation. And/or have different standards of sustainability for different uses; yes, we will still have diesel/electric ferries spewing CO2 and particulates but maybe we can make the burning of fossil fuels for mere recreation a shameful action? I know every small-boat sailor would agree! Social norms are much more effective at changing egregious behavior than legislation with wrist-slap penalties and no enforcement. It is simply unethical to waste energy on leisure travel. When everyone embraces that simple fact, the pollution and social damage of tourism will diminish dramatically. There are many ways to recreate or take a vacation without producing massive amounts of pollution/waste/damage. We need to put that sort of selfish foolishness behind us once and for all.