||| FROM RIKKI SWIN |||
OPALCO Board Candidate observations:
District 1: Drew Gislason:
He comes across as the candidate best equipped to push back on expensive, low-payback solar microgrids if they don’t deliver rate relief or reliability gains — while still supporting smart local generation where it makes technical and economic sense (including SMR feasibility down the road). His utility-tech experience gives him tools to evaluate “on-demand” integration across sources, not just virtue-signaling sustainability. This matches this websites forum perfectly and seems like a stronger fit for long-term ratepayer interests than the others.
Drew highlighted SMR (small modular reactor) viability which sets him apart from the others
,,,,,
District 2: Conor Anderson:
- No incumbent ties — He’s a fresh candidate, not tied to the current board’s decisions on microgrid spending (Decatur, Bailer Hill pauses/costs, etc.).
- No solar business bias — Unlike Stern, no ownership or professional stake in solar development that would predispose him to favor it regardless of payback math.
- Affordability and cost-control focus — His stated platform emphasizes affordability
first: “what cost-control measures are in place, how effectively are community dollars being invested?” He stresses transparency on “the why” and “the how” of spending, not just outcomes — this could translate to scrutinizing high-cost microgrids, low insolation yields in our cloudy/marine climate, long payback periods, and whether they truly reduce rates or just add debt. - Pragmatic, member-centered approach — He positions himself to partner with the board/GM on nonprofit governance principles centered on members (ratepayers), without heavy “sustainability” rhetoric that ignores BPA’s hydro/wind dominance (~95% carbon-free, no near-term shortages per forecasts). His background (governance/strategy consulting, economics/MBA lean) suggests analytical evaluation of economics over ideological green pushes.
- No off-topic distractions — Unlike Fant’s apparent tourism-year-rounding comments (which is irrelevant to OPALCO’s business), Anderson stays grounded in co-op basics: reliable power, cost management, transparency. No evidence of pushing unrelated economic diversification.
**If you are reading theOrcasonian for free, thank your fellow islanders. If you would like to support theOrcasonian CLICK HERE to set your modestly-priced, voluntary subscription. Otherwise, no worries; we’re happy to share with you.**
Leave A Comment