— from Michael Riordan —
During the recent smoke surge into northwest Washington from Canadian fires, San Juan County was flying blind in a fog, without instruments.
Every other county in the Puget Sound area belongs to one of three regional clean air agencies, which monitor the local air quality to help inform citizens and government leaders about potential problems, recommending possible responses. At multiple stations, they measure quantities like particulate matter, ozone, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide levels. In the recent incident, for example, particulate matter rose to “Unhealthy” levels throughout Puget Sound, especially impacting sensitive groups like asthmatics and older people. For several days, it seemed like we were living in Beijing. Burn bans went into effect, and people were advised to avoid strenuous outdoor activities.
But San Juan County has no capacity to monitor local air quality. Why not?
In its infinite wisdom, the San Juan County Council decided over a decade ago that such a capability was not worth the cost. I first learned about this decision from Rick Hughes when I asked the question during opposition to the Cherry Point coal terminal. [1] At that time, the cost of joining the Northwest Clean Air Agency (NWCAA) and getting a monitoring station established here — say in Eastsound or Friday Harbor — was a paltry $8,500 per year. But Rick quickly estimated what fraction of an FTE (full-time equivalent salary) would be required to cover this fee. Somehow the wealthiest county in Washington state could not afford to pay about four bits (50 cents) per person. That ended the discussion.
But it unfortunately didn’t end the need, as last week’s suffocating smoke pollution underscored. I had to look up figures for Anacortes and Bellingham to get even a rough idea of the local levels of fine particulate matter, the worst kind, which can easily enter the blood steam from the lungs. And it may well have been worse, as a large smoke stream flowed from inland British Columbia through the Fraser River gap directly toward the San Juan Islands (see August 1 satellite photo above).
This kind of pollution especially hurts older people, who comprise a large percentage of the county population. And it must have affected the bicyclists, kayakers and other outdoor sports enthusiasts, who swarmed to these islands this summer, as they do every summer. Indeed, when I went out paddling Saturday afternoon, I felt short of breath and ended early.
In winter, smoke from wood stoves is probably the principal contributor to particulate-matter levels, according to NWCAA officials, especially when the wind dies down and the smoke collects in hollows and valleys. Plenty of island homes are heated that way, so the problem can become severe. But without measurements, we just don’t know.
And if a major release of sulfurous gases like sulfur dioxide ever occurs, say from anchored or passing oil tankers and other vessels,[2] we‘d certainly smell it but would not know how severe the problem was nor where it originated.[3] The regional clean air agencies do a world of good for every other county in the Puget Sound area, monitoring local air quality and keeping it healthy at nominal cost. The Northwest Clean Air Agency has talented, hard-working engineers and other professionals, with whom I have worked on coal-terminal and oil-refinery emissions. They deserve our support, and we definitely need what they can offer.
It’s high time San Juan County stopped being penny wise and pound foolish, and instead joined this agency.
References:
- Michael Riordan, “Gateway Pacific Coal Port Rejected — At Last,” Whatcom Watch, June 2016.
- Michael Riordan “Burping Tankers Spread Sulfurous Fumes,” Northwest Citizen, June 14, 2017.
- Michael Riordan, “Noxious Fumes Hit Whatcom County,” Whatcom Watch, July 2017.
**If you are reading theOrcasonian for free, thank your fellow islanders. If you would like to support theOrcasonian CLICK HERE to set your modestly-priced, voluntary subscription. Otherwise, no worries; we’re happy to share with you.**
Michael, I agree that air pollution is a threat to our health, especially for seniors and asthmatics such as myself. If the cost is really only $8,500 annually, I would be happy to pay for it.
The equipment described at the Department of Ecology’s website looks much more complex and expensive:
https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/documents/0002007.pdf
PM2.5 TAPERED ELEMENT OSCILLATING MICROBALANCE WITH FILTER DYNAMIC MEASUREMENT SYSTEM OPERATING PROCEDURE
Air Quality Program
August 2015
Publication #00-02-007
Also, there are so many possible air quality micro-environments in our islands, maybe the following would be more useful. Janet
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/with-wearable-devices-that-monitor-air-quality-scientists-can-crowdsource-pollution-maps-180954556/
With Wearable Devices That Monitor Air Quality, Scientists Can Crowdsource Pollution Maps
Emerging technology means anyone with a smartphone can become a mobile environmental monitoring station
You make a good argument, Michael. Thanks for highlighting this important health issue.
I agree – we need this capacity.
Do we need to pay for “research monitoring” to decide that an impact like this recent one affects us? Just go outside, like we all did, and feel the acrid sensation in the throat, or the smell of smoke, or the clogging of the airways to know what’s happening. Don’t rely on words…just use your common sense(s)/
Thank you for this important information Michael. Being one of the “older people” (75) on the island I got a small taste of what it can be like. We have two dogs that I let out a few times each day. Sometimes I stay outside while they are out, and other times I stay in the house and watch them. So during those times I was only out for short periods. However a couple of days ago I decided it would be ok to take a bag of trash down the driveway to put in the dumpster. Big mistake. It meant that I was exposed to the bad air longer than usual and suffered the consequences when I got back in the house and my eyes were burning, stinging and watering.I applied a cold very wet washcloth to my eyes and let the cold water do it’s job. My eyes felt better immediately, but there was still some burning.My exposure was really not that much longer than the times I let the dogs out, but enough to make a big difference.
I must say I am shocked that we don’t have any way to monitor local air quality, or that we are the only county in the Puget Sound area without that capability. I would think it would be a priority. I already use an inhaler for wheezing, which no doubt other residents do as well, and the smoke for the number of days we’ve had it and the concentration of it obviously is not helping. Today is the first day in approximately one week with the smoke
that I actually saw a very small area of blue sky overhead, yet everywhere else I looked was shrouded in low hanging smoke.
I hope this issue is reconsidered and if we are ever in another situation like this we will at least be able to keep track of the air quality and make recommendations accordingly for people to follow, be it total fire bans (including beach fires, etc.) staying indoors, etc. Yes, common sense should prevail, but we were not prepared for the amount of smoke that came into our area and obviously had no idea how serious it could be.I do know of at least one local physician who has been receiving daily calls from many people with sore throats and burning eyes.
We hopefully will never be faced with this again, but wouldn’t it be better to spend some money for an insurance policy than to do nothing. At least then we would be prepared. Especially since we are talking about people’s health.
Agreed Micheal!
What would be the next action toward the goal of getting the county on board? An initiative? What’s the path forward?
And while we are at it since we boost our islands as such a bikers holiday, I’d like to see shoulders on our main roads before a biker is killed.
Oh, and how about supporting some kind of housing for homeless high school students?
And…
Re Janet Alderton’s good comment, we most likely do not need the complete suite of equipment to measure all the pollutants, for example sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides. But particulate matter is indeed a problem here, and measuring it not that expensive. I neglected to mention dust from gravel roads in the summer, which is a huge problem in the neighborhood where I live, View Haven Estates near Eastsound.